Skip to content

Conversation

nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.

Fixes #47153

r? @pnkfelix

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 17, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@pnkfelix pnkfelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bors r+

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors p=1

Major blocker for NLL

@MaloJaffre
Copy link
Contributor

@pnkfelix Bors seems not to have reacted to the r+.

@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

@bors r=pnkfelix

Might not see review comments?

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

📌 Commit 3b390e5 has been approved by pnkfelix

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 3b390e5 with merge b85aefb...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2018
remove bogus assertion and comments

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.

Fixes #47153

r? @pnkfelix
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: pnkfelix
Pushing b85aefb to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3b390e5 into rust-lang:master Jan 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants